The research results will be published by the “Young Barristers” on June 8th. This is not the first electoral survey for the organization. The “Young Barristers” carried out a similar research before presidential elections in 2013.
According to the evaluations of Giorgi Vashadze, it is important to release loca self-governments from centralized governance, they must be given more financial autonomy and the city must be given a real decentralization of self-governments
Non-governmental organization the “Young Barristers” responds to an initiative of Georgian Prime-minister Irakli Gharibashvili on raising the election threshold of local self-government elections up to 50%
NGO "Young Lawyers" estimates that transparency of presidential elections held on October 27, 2013 is an opportunity for the country to start the real democratic reforms and to actively involve people in politics.
The Ministry has no position in connection with five important themes set by “Young barristers”. According to the letter received for the name of organization /26.07.2012/ all questions mentioned by us are ignored, that causes special worry
Changes taken by the minister of foreign affairs of Georgia are political decisions and they may be assessed as punishment activity towards the Georgian Diasporas who made periodical systematic actions against ruling political party of Georgia before parliamentary elections of 2012. The order of minister doesn’t have other explanation and supposition
In parliamentary elections of October of 2012, the authority made full mobilization of mandator institute. Mandators of Tbilisi notify “Young barristers” without identification that they have already taken the task to carry out active control in future elections.
Multilateral contract term by motive of getting support in the elections offered by ruling political party of executive and legislative government of Georgia to the citizens of Georgia presents nonsense in practice of contract law and from formal standpoint it means conditional contract, kind of previous contract and by content it is discriminating.