The organization offers the ministry to establish new approaches and criteria, when the state take commitment to help to the students who suspended status to continue their studies.
The “Young Barristers” remarks, that the dispute with administrative body by its content, goes beyond the legal reasoning and makes know for the society the fact of issuing fake certificates by the former Minister of Education and Science of Georgia - Dimitri Shashkini.
The organization “Young Barristers” held a meeting with the civil society in the Center for Civic Engagement in Batumi, and presented the research on the case of illegally deprived property of Roland Bladadze in Adjara afret the “Rose Revolution”.
The organization “Young Barristers”, within the framework of the project “Institutional Dialogue with the Executive, Legislative, Judicial Authorities” had meeting with Gela Dumbadze, the State Minister of Georgia for Diaspora Issues.
The organization “Young barristers” appeals to the Mayor of Tbilisi - Davit Narmania to start a real reform on the issue of kindergartens in the capital and allocate appropriate funds from the current and 2015 capital budget for the children, who were left without municipal kindergartens.
The “Young barristers” addressed to the parlament with proposal to prepare a new edition of the legislative provision in June, 2014.
The organization “Young Barristers” will prepare the research on the legal issues of Sakdrisi-Kachaghiani monument.
Tbilisi City Court will resume the dispute on the lawsuit of the “Young Barristers” towards the director of “Tabula” - Tamar Chergoleishvili on November 12 , 2014, 16:00.
According to the published research of the “Young Barristers”, the Chairman of the Constitutional Court of Georgia - Giorgi Papuashvili did not answer 12 public questions, which is connected to the legal and factual issues of living in the illegally deprived house in Adjara after the "Rose Revolution".
The “Young Barristers”, in the preparation of monitoring process, addressed to the Chairman of the Constitutional Court, in June of 2013. The issues raised by the organization concerned the following circumstances regarding the case: