Justice
Tbilisi City Court responds to special statement, made by “Young Barristers”, and recommendation letter sent to Georgian high council of jurisdiction, which negativelty estimated the order from the law of first instance, July 1st, 2014, according to whcich, in stated court, judges were appointed to criminal, public and administrative case categories.
Co-founder and leader of “Young Barristers”, Archil Kaikatsishvili states, that Georgia need immediate democratic reforms, as for public, solid democratic institutions.
“Young Barristers” proof is, that respondent must neglect the offencive inquiries about her aknowledge reputation, as respondent Tamar Chergoleishvili’s statements were neither comments, thoughts, assumptions nor evaluation.
„Young Barristers” estimate, that introduction of jury in 2010 was part of the political will. The institute could not succeed in its’ mission, rejuvenating the trust of court in people, citizens’ involvement during legal actions and reality of defense of human rights.
''Young Barristers’’ respond to Ministry of Justice's legislative initiative about appointment of judges permanently installed criterion to regulate by organic law act.
The civil court of Batumi, against the public college ‘New Wave’ of Kobuleti, subject by the Ministry of Education and Science, opens the review of a new case by ‘The Young Barristers’
The decision of chairman of the court is halting the effective realization of justice, because majority of the cases at Tbilisi Public Court, from July 1st, 2014, will be addressed to different judges according to the categories.
“Young Barristers” state, that Tbilisi public court made an illegal resolution for the case of Irakli Qveladze, by which the evidences and and actual circumstances were not shared
